Comments on: Sebastian’s Mad Muay Thai Skillz

by: Administrator

Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:54:28 +0000

Look, Jay; I could care less about your lifestyle. So long as you’re not involving kids or animals, your proclivities are nobody’s business but your own. I’m sure Seb is flattered.

by: Michael Hawkins

Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:43:56 +0000

“I answer by pointing out you are the one who, not sometimes–but always–is concerned about anything Seb-related on this blog. ”

there’s … there’s more? do you even seriously discuss anything else besides Sebastian these days?

by: Jay

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:01:53 +0000

I back up the things Sebastian does, because I’m able to see the difference he and other make in Baltimore City. I see the positive changes, because he gives a shit. No more, no less. I back up his arguments, as well as the arguments of the other pro-gunners who comment here, because they are the truth as desperately as you want them not to be. I defend logic and common sense, not mindless chiding and chants of “gunloon”. And if you recall, I first brought up your apparent obsession with him after what…the second or third post you made dedicated to nothing but nonsense attempting to mock him. If that amounts to gayness in your mind, so be it. I’m happily engaged to a wonderful female, so say whatever makes you happy.

by: Administrator

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:23:10 +0000

Jay: I know you’re concentrating on Seb and not my answer but I’ll walk you through it slo-o-o-owly.
…

You constantly ask about my “obsession” with Seb. I answer by pointing out you are the one who, not sometimes–but always–is concerned about anything Seb-related on this blog. Always. I should also note your comments regarding Seb seem to frequently include fantasies about Seb and sweat and being hot and other allusions to homoerotica. Why?

by: Jay

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:06:27 +0000

You’ve not answered a thing. If you’d read back through the comments, you would be able to see that as plainly as I can. Your comments back to me, in chronological order, read as such:

“Jay: Defending your boy again? Sounds like a crush.”

Then:

“Jay: Everytime Seb posts or there’s a post about Seb–you’re there. Hey, different strokes, etc.”

And this most recent one:

“Jay: You asked the question about obsession. I answered it. I’m sure Seb is comforted by the nearness of you.”

Which one of those answered any of the questions I asked, Jade?

Oh, that’s right. NONE OF THEM. Nice try though.

by: Administrator

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:13:06 +0000

Jay: You asked the question about obsession. I answered it. I’m sure Seb is comforted by the nearness of you.

by: Jay

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:03:56 +0000

Way to avoid the question, douchebag.

Billy - Probably not. But hey, even if there were some anti-gunners or fence-sitters out there reading, I’m sure they’re impressed with the constant avoidance and misdirection Jade employs to ward off honest questions.

Especially honest questions about the nature of his apparent obsession with a particular pro-gunner who often trashes his arguments.

by: Administrator

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:40:01 +0000

Jay: Everytime Seb posts or there’s a post about Seb–you’re there. Hey, different strokes, etc.

by: Billy

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:32:39 +0000

Yeah this blog IS a shitheap. Does anybody read this but Gunnies looking for a laugh?

by: Jay

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:30:52 +0000

I’m not defending anyone, jackass. I’m trying to figure out why a significant portion of your blog has been focused on Sebastian lately.

Like I said in response to one of your comments on an earlier entry - if anyone has a crush on Seb, it’s you, not me. I’ve made less than 10 comments total to your little shitheap of a blog here, while you’ve dedicated numerous entire posts to talking about Sebastian.

Who’s got a crush again?