Sebastian: Muay Thai, Guns and Manhood
Who can forget:
I don’t recall ever saying I could KO either of those men (although with the Okinawan karate and Muay Thai experience I have, if the rules permitted me to use my legs and elbows and knees, a boxer who’s only trained in using his fists would be in trouble if a real fight broke out…
For the record, Sebastian is claiming Lennox Lewis or Mike Tyson would be in “trouble” if they ever took on Sebastian. Personally, I believe the only trouble Lewis or Tyson would be in is with lawyers for the posthumous Sebastian.
… says just the act of carrying a gun makes a person less likely to be caught off guard. “When you’re carrying you are hypervigilant,” he says. “You have this tremendous responsibility; you have to be extremely careful not to reveal [the gun] or let someone take it away. I made myself a target by walking slow, looking at the ground, talking on my cell at 10 p.m.”
Imagine that! Just the act of carrying a firearm makes you like Spiderman (”with great power, comes great responsibility”); a gun has magical powers.
Somebody’s compensating.
This is getting pathetic…
Comment by Mike_the_Army_Officer — November 29, 2007 @ 10:25 pm
You know, I keep coming back here to take potshots at poor reasoning behind gun politics, but it would appear you’ve given up on those Jade.
Mind that Tyson was severely injured by someone who was not an accomplished martial artist, outside of the ring.
He may be a professional athlete, doesn’t make him invincible or bestow superpowers upon him.
I really love how you’re turnning that testimony into something complete different than intended.
That person was saying that he pays more attention when packing a concealed weapon, and you claim he said it bestows superpowers upon him? Give me a break.
…
no wait, give me a serious topic to discuss on this blog.
Comment by Michael Hawkins — November 30, 2007 @ 6:41 am
This is getting creepy
Comment by Bill — November 30, 2007 @ 12:13 pm
It is a little creepy, isn’t it? He doesn’t ever answer any of your questions about why fully half of his last ten posts have been about me. My theory: somebody who isn’t a diehard right winger but still respects the RKBA is a really scary thing for an insecure pantywaist who needs the govt to protect him.
Notice he never did man up and accept my offer for a demonstration of my martial arts skills? Instead he prattled on some nonsense about me versus Mike Tyson, as though it necessarily follows that if you can’t beat up a 225lb professional pugilist then you can’t defend yourself at all (even though sportsmen like Tyson tend to do really poorly in fights that don’t have rules, a referee, and you’re not limited to just using fists in gloves). Somebody says they’re more careful when wearing a gun? THEY THINK THEY’RE SPIDERMAN! Somebody says they’ve studied a couple martial arts? THEY THINK THEY’RE STEVEN SEAGAL! Lacking anything compelling or logical to say in support of the failed case for gun control? Post a picture of a chimp with your opponents name on it, cause gee, that takes a lot of intellectual prowess, doesn’t it?
When you don’t have a real argument to make, you launch a series of personal attacks at somebody I guess. Is it any wonder that the Brady Campaign and the VPC aren’t asking Jadepenis for his help?
It’d be the greatest thing ever for gun rights if they actually did, actually.
Comment by Sebastian-PGP — December 3, 2007 @ 9:35 pm
Geez, Sebastian, drinking again?
Comment by Administrator — December 3, 2007 @ 9:50 pm
tyson is more of a brawler than a pugilist.
And Jade is more of a stalker than an attacker. He just needs love.
Comment by Billy — December 3, 2007 @ 9:50 pm
Drinking? What part of “you can’t make compelling arguments so instead you make personal attacks” is hard to understand?
Pretty sure I didn’t stutter there, shitbreath. Tell me again how a monkey wearing a gi is a compelling political argument?
Comment by Sebastian-PGP — December 3, 2007 @ 10:50 pm